¿ø¹® http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/03/mri_software_bugs_could_upend_years_of_research/?mt=1467666616578
fMRI ±â°è ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î¿¡ ¹ö±×°¡ ¹ß°ßµÇ¼ ¼ö³â°£ÀÇ ³ú¿¬±¸°¡ ¹°°ÅÇ°Çà
(¹ß¹ø¿ª ÁÖÀÇ)
A whole pile of ¡°this is how your brain looks like¡± fMRI-based science has been potentially invalidated because someone finally got around to checking the data.
fMRI¸¦ ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ÇÑ '´ç½ÅÀÇ ³ú°¡ ¾î¶»°Ô º¸À̴°¡' °°Àº ³ú¿¬±¸ ÀÚ·áµéÀÌ ¸ù¶¥ ÀáÀçÀûÀ¸·Î À¯È¿ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ» °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ÀÖÀ½. ÀçÈ®ÀÎ ÇÊ¿äÇÔ
In this paper at PNAS, they write: ¡°the most common software packages for fMRI analysis (SPM, FSL, AFNI) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%. These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies and may have a large impact on the interpretation of neuroimaging results.¡±
fMRI ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ÆÐÅ°Áö°¡ 70%Á¤µµ ¿ÀÂ÷°¡ ¿¹»óµÊ. 4¸¸¿©°³ÀÇ fMRI ¿¬±¸µéÀÇ À¯È¿¼ºÀÌ ÀÇ½ÉµÇ¸ç ³ú½Å°æ¿µ»ó¿¬±¸ °á°úµéÀÇ Çؼ®¿¡ ¹«½Ã¹«½ÃÇÑ ÆĶõÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °Í
Ãâó : °í·Á´ëÇб³ °íÆĽº 2024-08-01 17:02:20: